sales@rlmsolutions.com | (888) 800-0106 | Schedule a Call
AI-Powered Security

Detect Threats Through Behavioral Deviation — Not Signatures

Security behavioral analytics establishes statistical baselines for normal activity across users, endpoints, applications, and networks — detecting deviations that indicate compromised accounts, insider threats, malware behavior, and lateral movement through anomaly detection that doesn't require prior knowledge of the attack.

Overview

What RLM Delivers on Security Behavioral Analytics

Signature-based detection fails against novel attacks, living-off-the-land techniques, and slow-burn insider threats. Behavioral analytics provides detection capability that scales with attack sophistication — any behavior that deviates significantly from established patterns triggers investigation.

Advisory Approach

How We Approach Security Behavioral Analytics

We work Security Behavioral Analytics the same way each time: establish the baseline, test the market properly, negotiate on evidence, and stay involved through implementation.

1

Behavioral Data Source Assessment

We assess the behavioral telemetry available in your environment — authentication events, endpoint telemetry, network flows, application logs, and DLP events — and identify the data gaps that limit behavioral analytics coverage.

Data Source AuditTelemetry CoverageGap Analysis
2

Analytics Platform Evaluation

We evaluate security behavioral analytics platforms — Exabeam, Microsoft Sentinel UEBA, Securonix, Splunk UBA, and integrated behavioral analytics in XDR and NDR platforms — against your data sources and the specific behaviors you need to detect.

Platform ComparisonBehavior CoverageXDR Integration
3

Baseline Model Design

We design the baseline configuration — entity categorization, peer grouping, feature selection, and the weighting model — that accurately represents normal behavior in your specific environment.

Baseline ArchitecturePeer Group DesignFeature Engineering
4

Risk Score Integration

We design the risk score integration with your SIEM and SOAR — ensuring behavioral risk scores enrich analyst investigations, trigger automated enrichment, and appear in the right place in the analyst workflow.

Risk Score IntegrationAlert EnrichmentSOAR Trigger Design
Evaluation Criteria

Security Behavioral Analytics Evaluation Criteria

These are the dimensions we have seen separate a Security Behavioral Analytics deployment that works from one that quietly becomes shelfware.

01

Baseline Quality

Behavioral analytics is only as good as the behavioral baselines established. Evaluate the baseline learning period required and the data quality needed — poor-quality or insufficient behavioral data produces unreliable baselines and high false positive rates.

02

Peer Group Accuracy

Behavioral analytics compares users to their peers. Evaluate the peer group definition quality — an executive being compared to general employees will generate excessive anomalies; comparison to other executives provides meaningful deviation detection.

03

Coverage of High-Risk Entities

Service accounts, privileged users, and contractors represent disproportionate risk. Evaluate the platform's ability to apply enhanced behavioral monitoring to high-risk entity categories.

04

Alert Prioritization Quality

Behavioral analytics generates risk scores, not discrete alerts. Evaluate the alert prioritization model — whether risk scores accurately surface the most dangerous behaviors vs. generating noise from unusual-but-benign activity.

05

Integration with Identity Context

Behavioral analytics that incorporates identity context — role, department, recent HR events, access certification status — provides significantly more accurate anomaly detection. Evaluate identity data integration depth.

06

Multi-Source Correlation

Single-source behavioral analytics misses multi-step attacks that each appear normal in isolation. Evaluate cross-source correlation capability — detecting the sequence of anomalies that together constitute an attack.

"We had three overlapping security tools doing the same job. RLM helped us rationalize the stack, cut spend by 30%, and actually improve our detection coverage in the process."

VP of Information Security — Regional Healthcare System

No upfront fees, no retainer, and no obligation to act on what we find.

A Sample of the Security Providers We Evaluate

CrowdStrikeFortinetPalo Alto NetworksZscalerProofpointeSentireForesite Cybersecurity

RLM is vendor neutral. These are among 600+ providers in our evaluation set — inclusion here is not an endorsement, and we are paid by the provider you choose, not by any provider in particular. How that works →

Where Do You Want to Start With Security Behavioral Analytics?

Start with a no-cost conversation with an RLM security advisor — vendor neutral, no agenda, just clarity on where your gaps are and the right path to close them.

Talk to a Security Advisor

Talk to an Advisor